I am liberal Zionist. So I guess I am stuck with this rhetoric.

I certainly don't fault Jordan for the way in which Zionists ethnically cleansed Palestine.

Which other places were Jewish refugees welcome? Those that did go home were often murdered or driven away because their erstwhile neighbors declined to return the property they had "adopted". This culminated in the Kielce Pogrom of '46. It's telling that many DP inhabitants didn't want to go to Palestine in the first place. They wanted to go to the US, or Britain primarily, but weren't welcome. Rashid Khalidi acknowledges this on p. 61, paragraph 3 of The Hundred Years War on Palestine (and this regard even Khalidi is misleading, implying the effects of the '39 White Paper were "negated"; they weren't. The Mandate continued to restrict Jewish immigration to the end).

I don't blame you, as a Palestinian, for believing that wasn't reason enough to displace some of the inhabitants. I think the way in which the process set forth was atrocious & criminal. I think we can agree on that.

But the idea that Jews were somehow welcome elsewhere, or had alternatives, is not correct.