Offering a reaction based solely on your essay—I don't have a dog in this fight—I appreciate your conclusion: namely that your belief in Puerto Rican independence is at least partly emotional, & based on national pride.

No doubt that my own home state, California, came into the union by way of imperialist policies. Certainly both it & the US as a whole have benefitted from those policies. You suggest that statehood for Puerto Rico would reward sins of the past. Perhaps so. But shouldn't the only question be: which path forward will benefit the people of Puerto Rico the most?

I think, by comparison, that the Hawaian independence movement is based on sound principles, but to permit states to leave the union would set a dangerous precedent & weaken the country overall. Seen in that light, perhaps 52%, even in a non-binding referendum, isn't enough. Perhaps we should require a 2/3s majority before enacting statehood?

As a practical matter, I would like to see the admission of a Spanish-speaking state into the union in order to put to rest the ridiculous assertion by nationalists that English, & only English, must be spoken here. But that's no reason for the island's residents to rush pell mell into anything.

Greatly appreciate your well thought out analysis.

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store